From kde-devel  Mon Jun 18 05:46:16 2007
From: "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:46:16 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Reason for both .local and .Trash?
Message-Id: <200706172346.17109.aseigo () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=118214562620282
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1458121717=="

--===============1458121717==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2679642.ZL3JPK5heI";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart2679642.ZL3JPK5heI
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 17 June 2007, Kelly wrote:
> On Monday, June 18, 2007 12:53 am Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > >Is there any reason why kde4 can't have a better unified solution?
> >
> > We have. It's called the freedesktop.org Trash specification:
> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/trash-spec
> >
> > Unfortunately, I can't access the specification file. The website is
> > down.
>
> I can.  It appears the spec uses .Trash as well.

that's only supposed to be for the top level in mounted media, and is optio=
nal=20
part of the spec.

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

=46ull time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)

--nextPart2679642.ZL3JPK5heI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQBGdhwp1rcusafx20MRAkXEAJdoj9enPSCdVdb/m6YnrCwSrdHvAJ9102gv
omgVL6x/5AuP6t1LVHBUJQ==
=LMqk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2679642.ZL3JPK5heI--

--===============1458121717==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============1458121717==--