[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Google SoC Project Idea: Kate Feature Extension
From:       Michael Pyne <mpyne () purinchu ! net>
Date:       2007-03-02 20:02:11
Message-ID: 200703021502.14510.mpyne () purinchu ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Friday 02 March 2007 04:03, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On March 2, 2007, Kleag wrote:
> > would have been to remove kwrite instead because of the fact that the
>
> s,remove,move,
>
> in any case, the majority of desktop using people do not need any of the
> advantages of kate. in fact, the features of kate make it a more clumsy
> solution for most people who aren't involved in, say, writing software or
> similar tasks where kate shines.
>
> you're trying to optimize the minimal sets for the wrong group of people: a
> power user minority.

This "power user" happens to prefer kwrite, as it starts up much quicker...

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]