--===============0604910941==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart5397071.GQPl2nRkkH";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart5397071.GQPl2nRkkH
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 29 January 2007 22:51:25 me wrote:
> Do you use a d-pointer for your classes and if so are these classes copied
> around by the assignment operator? The implicit assignment copies just the
> d-pointer itself AFAICS. This overwrites the original d-pointer and the
> original private object stays without any pointer to it: mem leakage :(.

Hmm, this becomes a non-issue, if you use the proposed form for the d-pointer
	Private * const d;
instead of just
	Private * d;

It'd be cool, if the code checker tests for this.

Regards,
Stefan

--nextPart5397071.GQPl2nRkkH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFvxeFpfDn2DABIpcRAgBVAKCNCb9vCXOqnQABELHkGLTbwrNrUACgmlEj
vbpqZDRsq9/gDGPldl5M3G8=
=gb+E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5397071.GQPl2nRkkH--

--===============0604910941==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0604910941==--