[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Some questions regarding development for KDE3
From:       Guillaume Laurent <glaurent () telegraph-road ! org>
Date:       2007-01-18 21:54:43
Message-ID: 200701182254.43862.glaurent () telegraph-road ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 18 January 2007 20:29, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Indentation has to be at least minimally aware of the language syntax and
> > perform some basic parsing in order to know how to indent things. Kate's
> > indentation appears to be completely braindead.
>
> Um... you /are/ using one of the C indenters (and not 'normal'), right?
> They're plenty buggy, but I wouldn't go so far as to call them
> /brain-dead/. In fact, they work just fine a good part of the time.

Compared to what I'm used to with (X)Emacs, it's sorely lacking.

> > - 'Find in Files' merely calls /usr/bin/find ?? You've got to be kidding
> > here, I suppose it's just a temporary fill-in until the real feature is
> > done.
>
> *You're* kidding here, right? What on *earth* would we write ourselves
> that would be more powerful than 'find'?

Gee, I don't know, something like Eclipse's indexing feature perhaps ?

> > And it doesn't keep the previous searches in memory.
>
> Huh? I have no idea what you mean...

Eclipse keeps a history of searches and lets you display the previous ones 
very easily.

-- 
Guillaume.
http://telegraph-road.org
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]