--===============0241117860==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart36989621.0fQtFVyHh5";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart36989621.0fQtFVyHh5
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:40, Remi Villatel wrote:
> I already patched "my" KDE and so far everything is still working ;-)
> but what's the point in releasing patches if they won't be used? So, can
> I start to flood the list with cosmetic patches for KDE 3.5 or is it not
> worth the trouble?

I'd say it's worth it, if only because it's not like KDE 4 is a complete=20
rewrite.  A lot of the porting is done automatically, so some of your patch=
es=20
may apply in principle to KDE 4 as well.

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne

--nextPart36989621.0fQtFVyHh5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEVXjeqjQYp5Omm0oRAgjoAJ4rWt6rNmY/pvXkst/n0jlsjF0BtwCfU8yZ
2ZYQXRWrBkmiM3jStuSPWkg=
=acs1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart36989621.0fQtFVyHh5--

--===============0241117860==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0241117860==--