Hi Dirk and Thiago, Thanks a lot for your helpful information and clarification, I will contact khtml hackers for discussion. Regards, Cougar On 4/28/06, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Friday, 28. April 2006 06:47, LiuCougar wrote: > > > anyone interested in mentoring? > > If the person that did add this entry to the page doesn't step up, contact me > again please :) > > > In addition, the ideas about khtml are too brief to anticipate the > > workload. > > It is a rather isolated sub-part of the engine. while dependencies to the > other parts exists, I think it should be manageable. > > > > The "Rewrite DOM 2 traversal code" item, does it refer to > > Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Traversal and Range Specification > > Yes, the complete spec. > > > > > I searched in http://www.khtml.info/ and google for information about > > current status for DOM 2 traversal, with no much outcome . > > we have range and walkers > (http://websvn.kde.org/branches/KDE/3.5/kdelibs/khtml/dom/dom2_traversal.cpp?rev=465272&view=log) > but they weren#t maintained for a long time. > > > Another query is whether the intended target is kde 4 or kde 3? (I > > hope it's the former) > > I think the target should be KDE 4. > > > -- > Dirk//\ > -- "People's characters are strengthened through struggle against difficulties; they are weakened by comfort." - Old Chinese adage >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<