[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE4 documentation format
From:       Ricardo Cruz <rpmcruz () clix ! pt>
Date:       2006-04-21 21:41:35
Message-ID: 200604212241.35566.rpmcruz () clix ! pt
[Download RAW message or body]


Hey there,

 When I contributed to KDE as a translator, we had a hard time maintaining the 
documentation updated. At least back then, there wasn't any way to merge new 
changes to the documentation with our now outdated version.

 I don't know if currently there is some sort of versioning system for 
documentation. In negative case, I guess that would be a really useful summer 
of code project.

Cheers,
 Ricardo 

Em Sexta, 21 de Abril de 2006 20:25, o Thomas Kadauke escreveu:
> Am Friday 21 April 2006 20:34 schrieb Frans Englich:
> > On Friday 21 April 2006 19:15, Thomas Kadauke wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a question for which I need answers in order to be able to apply
> > > for this year's summer of code: Are there any plans to alter / get rid
> > > of the current docbook format? Don't get me wrong, I don't want that
> > > format to change, I wouldn't even have suggestions, I just need to know
> > > if there are plans to change it.
> >
> > I don't think so. Lauri Watts, our documentation queen, has expressed
> > conservatism in this area. Personally, I would find it interesting to
> > upgrade to Docbook 5.0, for several reasons.
> >
> > What are your plans? :)
>
> As I said, I don't have plans to change the docbook format, I just need to
> know if it's going to stay stable. For my SoC plans ... nah, I would never
> tell my plans on a public mailing list ;)
>
> --Thomas
>
-- 
Chicken Little only has to be right once.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]