[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: The number of unassigned bugs is worrisome
From:       Thiago Macieira <thiago () kde ! org>
Date:       2006-01-11 23:44:06
Message-ID: 200601112144.20778.thiago () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Mark A. Taff wrote:
>So, would it help the project crush more bugs faster if I set up a
> machine that runs the 3.5 branch so I can post svn revision numbers
> where the bug occurs when I submit a bug?  Or perhaps ignore 3.5 and go
> with head?  What if I set up such a machine and then went around adding
> revision numbers to bugs other people file?

It would help the project more if you become a developer and fix the bugs 
in the source code.

But we can also use your help in Bugzilla. We have one or two people whose 
only participation is Bugzilla: they test bugs, they report, etc. So, if 
you are building from Subversion and you don't patch your source code, 
testing is welcome.

So, yes, adding revision numbers to other people's bug helps a lot. That's 
what I do most of the time: "Confirmed, on KDE revision 4xxxxx", or "I 
can't reproduce, KDE 3.5 revision 4xxxxx".

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

1. On frumscafte, hwonne time_t wæs náht, se scieppend þone circolwyrde 
wundorcræftlíge cennede and seo eorðe wæs idel and hit wæs gód.

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]