--===============0141559273==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart4354073.lIuMT86efV";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart4354073.lIuMT86efV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 09:47 schrieb Isaac Clerencia:
> 2) Convince manual authors to a) relicense their works under the GPL, or
>    b) double-license them under both the GFDL and GPL.

How is the GPL a good license for documentation? Doesn't Debian allow for
Creative Commons Licenses? If I was to relicense my contributions to the do=
cs
(which is, granted, fairly little), I'd rather prefer CC (the exact conditi=
ons=20
will have to be discussed of course).

Cheers,
  Daniel

--nextPart4354073.lIuMT86efV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDv508u1Wkf8kBwz4RAtKGAJ46Z/CE/EkYJg+c7JSXUPPZMfEzRgCg+2/6
m9q5hXhMcSkcTfJBTpP0Y74=
=lb4A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4354073.lIuMT86efV--


--===============0141559273==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0141559273==--