From kde-devel  Sat Jan 07 10:31:12 2006
From: Brad Hards <bradh () frogmouth ! net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 10:31:12 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Debian, KDE and the GFDL problem
Message-Id: <200601072131.29291.bradh () frogmouth ! net>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=113663006423136
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0180374262=="

--===============0180374262==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1603674.7SeJiYLn0m";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1603674.7SeJiYLn0m
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday 05 January 2006 19:47 pm, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> 2) Convince manual authors to a) relicense their works under the GPL, or
>    b) double-license them under both the GFDL and GPL.
You may not relicense or double-license any of the documentation I have=20
contributed to.

There are no invariant sections in my stuff, and I think that makes it a fr=
ee=20
license. You are welcome to disagree. You are more than welcome not to=20
provide my documentation (or put it into non-free, whatever).

I haven't written much documentation, so this may not affect your broader=20
approach.=20

Brad

--nextPart1603674.7SeJiYLn0m
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDv5iBGwwszQ/PZzgRAocdAJsF+l9vKiVd09aa4DIkL82QsuP6bACgqSbb
S0MFQRz9mEGqxjwEpxJHm8s=
=d3Xa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1603674.7SeJiYLn0m--

--===============0180374262==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0180374262==--