From kde-devel  Wed Dec 21 03:00:27 2005
From: Craig Howard <kde () choward ! ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:00:27 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Missing Styles
Message-Id: <200512201900.28304.kde () choward ! ca>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=113513404829633

On Monday 19 December 2005 18:27, Craig Howard wrote:
> (Apologies if this gets received twice, but I've waited a day and it hasn't
> shown up, so I'm re-sending (with fixed typo (and extra parenthesis)).)
>
> On Sunday 18 December 2005 15:05, Henrique Pinto wrote:
> > On Sun 18 Dec 2005 20:46, Craig Howard wrote:
> > > Does anybody have any idea why
> > > KDE is not picking up these styles?
> >
> > Does it work if you build all of KDE with --enable-libsuffix=64 ?
>
> I haven't tried that, but
>
> ; ls -l /lib64
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2005-12-17 12:23 /lib64 -> lib
> ; ls -l /usr/lib64
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2005-12-17 12:23 /usr/lib64 -> lib
>
> So, I don't think the suffix is my problem.

So my problem is that I'm picking up qt in /usr/lib (Debian's version).  Maybe 
libsuffix is related after all.

Shouldn't having LD_LIBRARY_PATH set cause libraries to be searched from those 
paths before /usr/lib?  Is there some other reason that the KDE binaries are 
picking up the /usr/lib version of qt? 

Thanks.
-- 

Craig Howard
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<