--===============0438752417==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart8466964.hfUraemnxt";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart8466964.hfUraemnxt
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 05 December 2005 08:38, David Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 04 December 2005 11:16 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > Oh please, handling exceptions isn't that hard, and is much less
> > cumbersome than checking a return code (which has not at all the same
> > use, actually).
>=20
> Here's a link on the pitfalls of exceptions. I didn't write it, so=20
> apparently I'm not the only idiot in the world.
>=20
> http://www.google.com/search?q=3Dcache:r1bgFPLiw4QJ:www.octopull.demon.co=
=2Euk/c%2B%2B/dragons/+&hl=3Den&ie=3DUTF-8

Although my opinion might not count much here, I think the
exceptions are one of the big _misfeatures_ of the C++ language.
They bloat code. Nothing else. Everything done with exceptions,
can be done with normal return codes.

=2D-=20
Greetings Michael.

--nextPart8466964.hfUraemnxt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDlCMslb09HEdWDKgRAnAuAJ9LTXNpMFfCiq65RUZyTHpGZbyaOACfeu/2
sWh//j7eZJurHFEfDS4WSeY=
=uYPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart8466964.hfUraemnxt--

--===============0438752417==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0438752417==--