[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: C++ exceptions
From:       Guillaume Laurent <glaurent () telegraph-road ! org>
Date:       2005-12-05 7:16:24
Message-ID: 200512050816.24903.glaurent () telegraph-road ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 05 December 2005 05:13, David Johnson wrote:
>
> Exactly. Which is why they shouldn't be in libraries. The application
> author shouldn't be compelled to use a language feature he is not
> comfortable with.

Oh please, handling exceptions isn't that hard, and is much less cumbersome 
than checking a return code (which has not at all the same use, actually).

> A library function that returns an classic error code 
> can be used by both exception and no-exception using applications.

But it you try to handle an error which should be reported by an exception 
through a simple return code, you force the programmer into writing some 
pseudo-exception handling/stack unwinding code.

-- 
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]