[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE ABI stability?
From:       Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer () gmx ! at>
Date:       2005-12-04 20:51:33
Message-ID: 200512042151.46357.kevin.krammer () gmx ! at
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 04 December 2005 17:15, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 12/4/05, Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at> wrote:
> > > Great!  Where are they documented?  I do see the developer
> > > recommendations
> > > http://developer.kde.org/documentation/other/binarycompatibility.html
> > > but I don't see anything in e.g.
> > >   http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/release.html
> > > documenting what the policy is.
> > > For comparison, the Gnome "Release Planning" page,
> > >   http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/
> > > explicitly covers ABI stability policy.
> >
> > If nothing else, maybe you could add exactly what you wrote in your
> >
> > > email onto the kde site and link to it from the release planning
> > > page...
> >
> > Maybe better under http://developer.kde.org/policies/
>
> Yeah, but there has to be at least a pointer to it in
> the release planning page, I think.

A policy should always be followed, not just before a release.

But the check for binary compatability could be added

Cheers,
Kevin

-- 
Kevin Krammer <kevin.krammer@gmx.at>
Qt/KDE Developer, Debian User
Moderator: www.mrunix.de (German), www.qtforum.org

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]