[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Linux 2.6.13 vs. KDE 3.4 BRANCH
From:       James Richard Tyrer <tyrerj () acm ! org>
Date:       2005-10-15 18:53:06
Message-ID: 43515012.3080200 () acm ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Ivor Hewitt wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 08:19, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> 
>>Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>
>>>James Richard Tyrer wrote:
>>>
>>>You are not supposed to replace your system's provided kernel headers
>>>with that of any kernel you download. The kernel developers do not
>>>promise you can #include any header of theirs at all. That's why
>>>distributions create a set of sanitised headers that is "includable".
>>>
>>>So please revert your changes back to the distribution-provided headers.
>>>This should fix the problem. In case your distribution doesn't have such
>>>headers, file a bug report with them.
>>
>>I don't think that it would be relevant to file such a bug report for
>>the LFS distro.
>>
> 
> Not at all - LFS is very specific in explaining that you DO  NOT use raw 
> kernel headers, currently LFS uses the pld kernel include headers.

This is NEW with version 6.x.  However, it is not a LFS bug that these 
headers are not available with versions > 2.6.12.0 -- as I said, no 
point in filing a LFS bug report.  It doesn't solve the problem any more 
than the previous advice to use older headers if the newest ones didn't 
work.

-- 
JRT
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]