From kde-devel Sat Oct 01 18:39:48 2005 From: Michael Pyne Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 18:39:48 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Strange goings on with Juk (FC3, KDE Branch 3.5) Message-Id: <200510011439.49098.pynm0001 () unf ! edu> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=112819176919668 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1913216162==" --===============1913216162== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1328352.xW9v3hFNvd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1328352.xW9v3hFNvd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 01 October 2005 02:09, Steven P. Ulrick wrote: > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:35:03 -0500 > > "Steven P. Ulrick" wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:54:56 -0400 > > > > Michael Pyne wrote: > > > Perhaps you should try narrowing it down to the libraries that only > > > JuK and amarok have in common. Possibly musicbrainz? > > > > > > Regards, > > > - Michael Pyne > > > > Hello, Michael > > Well, after a recent full update of KDE from Branch 3.5, Amarok seems > > to be linked correctly. At least it's better than it was, and the > > Amarok version number and the KDE version that it uses seems to be > > correct. > > For your enjoyment/amusement, here is a pdf of a spread sheet that I > > did comparing the output of ldd on amarok and juk: > > http://www.afolkey2.net/Juk-Amaraok_Libraries.pdf Steven, The spreadsheet is interesting (I didn't know that amarok managed to avoid= =20 linking to all those libraries :). Possibly the problem lies in one of the= =20 extra libraries used by JuK pulling in a different set of the KDE libraries= =2E =20 So let's see what extra ones JuK uses: libakode <-- Correct libarts* <-- (Possibly) incorrect, but these don't link against KDE anyways= so=20 they shouldn't be the problem. libfam, libesd <-- Not related. libg* <-- Libraries used by gstreamer, so they shouldn't pull in the KDE=20 libraries either. libk* <-- These are the incorrect libraries, probably pulled in by somethin= g=20 further down in the list. libmad <-- Not related. libmcop <-- Part of aRts, shouldn't link against KDE. libogg, libpcre*, libposix, libpopt <-- Not related. libqtmcop <-- Part of aRts (I think), shouldn't be related. libsoundserver_idl <-- Part of aRts (I think), shouldn't be related. libtag <-- TagLib. This is also used by Amarok, I wonder if amarok is a=20 wrapper binary to the real program? libvorbis* <-- Not related. So, I'm not sure what would be pulling in the wrong JuK libraries. Since=20 you've already set LD_LIBRARY_PATH I'm not sure what else to suggest. Regards, - Michael Pyne --nextPart1328352.xW9v3hFNvd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDPtf1qjQYp5Omm0oRAv4HAJ9/50yYXljY4dA5ap7qAVxJBFyf+gCcCuRN IlIGFqEbw6u4Edbl5UlwH3Y= =z6p5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1328352.xW9v3hFNvd-- --===============1913216162== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline = >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscrib= e << --===============1913216162==--