[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDockWidget
From:       Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () babylon2k ! de>
Date:       2005-09-06 16:43:57
Message-ID: 200509061843.57901 () cullmann
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 05 September 2005 15:23, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > New, alternative solutions will be provided (unless i somehow don't
> > > find time) so he won't have to rewrite, just port
> >
> > I still would propose not to use it if you start now with new
> > development, KDockWidget is API and structure wise horrible broken in KDE
> > 3.x, has many bugs and errors, and even with a alternative for KDE 4,
> > really see no sense to now base new development on it ;)
>
> Where did I imply that any replacement would have a similar API or
> structure? Please quit putting words into my mouth.
Aehm, where did I say anything like that in my mail, I only pointed out that 
any development for KDE 3.x with KDockwidgets will have problems to be ported 
to KDE4, as there will be no 1:1 replacement around, and no, kde3support 
doesn't count for me their, given the shape of the kdockwidget inside it.

-- 
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Maintainance Team
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann@kde.org
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]