[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Brokering between developers and paying customers
From:       Jan de Visser <jdevisser () digitalfairway ! com>
Date:       2005-06-20 15:02:58
Message-ID: 200506201102.59343.jdevisser () digitalfairway ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 20 June 2005 10:23, Jason Harris wrote:
> Jan de Visser wrote:
> > That begs the question: If you would ask my boss, he would probably say
> > that my work 'advances our business'. I run GPLed Qt and KDE on my
> > desktop. So does that mean I need a commercial Qt?
>
> To simply use GPL'd Qt/KDE software, of course you don't need a
> commercial license.  The point is, if you are developing in-house
> software based on Qt that is used for commercial purposes, then
> (according to Trolltech) you do need a commercial license, even if the
> commercial code is not distributed.

I understand, but my point was that the line is awfully hard to draw.

>
> Jason

JdV!!

>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jan de Visser                     jdevisser@digitalfairway.com

                Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!
--------------------------------------------------------------
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]