--===============0186246752==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1196943.EzXMQYcKJc";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1196943.EzXMQYcKJc
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 04 June 2005 11:47, Wilfried Huss wrote:
> Ok. Well Stefan and me do work on it, so it would be great if proposals
> would be discussed with us, so that we can coordinate our work.
>
> So far nobody has done this.

as i said several times in our private email conversation over the last few=
=20
days: of course those people whose code is involved or affected would be pa=
rt=20
of the proposals, but that since no one as yet had gone through the google=
=20
process, we don't have any proposals to triage to the appropriate develoepr=
s?

> It is a bit unfortunate that is discussion has moved to the public
> mailinglist.

i don't think so at all; look at all the valuable input that's been had.=20
please don't go making a sad face about things ...

> This whole thing started because I asked Aaron and Zack to=20
> make the description of the bounty more general. They refused and I still
> don't understand why.

because it generally describes what we're hoping to see happen and these ar=
e=20
simply suggestions to get people going in the right direction.

i've spent a good amount of time over the last few days trying to answer yo=
ur=20
questions and concerns. that may not be possible to do in a satisfactory wa=
y,=20
and i accept that.

> > Why do you ask it to me and not to the two messages he has sent to the
> > list?
>
> I just asked this because you said he alone should decide about the design
> of the code. I am ok with this if he is willing to maintain it afterwards.
> But I think it would be better to discuss the design first.

you won't be forced to maintain anyone else's code. we are not even under a=
ny=20
obligation to accept bounty code into SVN. we're not going to do something=
=20
stupid here, where we=3D=3DKDE.

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

--nextPart1196943.EzXMQYcKJc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCol1t1rcusafx20MRAncjAKCIKRy2iNG1wLxP0DBWFo8/DZ5rEwCdGm1f
F2VMqk9BO+WAinKn4P9/Ff0=
=Pf5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1196943.EzXMQYcKJc--

--===============0186246752==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0186246752==--