[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: cvs/svn update differences
From:       Mikolaj Machowski <mikmach () wp ! pl>
Date:       2005-05-13 8:48:57
Message-ID: 200505131048.57801.mikmach () wp ! pl
[Download RAW message or body]

Dnia piątek 13 maj 2005 06:08, Michael Pyne napisał:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 02:30 pm, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
> > With CVS, whenever I updated, it would show M for every local modified
> > source file.  However, SVN doesn't do this.  I find this rather
> > irrating, albeit minor.  I realize that svn status will show this, but
> > it was nice to get update/status at the same time.
>
> Get used to doing it separately.  Using cvs up just to check what files
> you've modified hits the server anyways, so if you're just checking for
> modified files, svn forces you to use svn status to avoid wasting server
> CPU and bandwidth. ;)

Sorry, does that mean there is still CVS gate somewhere?

m.

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic