Aaron J. Seigo wrote:

> On Saturday 12 March 2005 03:50, Maurizio Colucci wrote:
>> > there's issues of code quality;
>>
>> This too is solved with the above proposal (coders have no reason to
>> deliver bad code anymore).
> 
> i suppose if the bounty wasn't released until the code was accepted by the
> maintainer and it follows KDE standards with regards to licensing,
> security, maintenance, etc... then this is probably solvable, yes.

Except you never know when you'll find an unexpected critical bug, and have
to revert the change

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<