[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: scons
From:       Martin Ellis <m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk>
Date:       2005-02-13 17:38:40
Message-ID: 200502131738.40440.m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 13 Feb 2005 16:23, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> No, please don't. Current autohell+scons ? This would mean yet
> another tool ! This would make the build system just even harder to
> understand I'm afraid.

My suggestion did not require that _everyone_ continue to use 
autotools,  merely that they were still available for apps that still 
need them (or that had not yet migrated to a new build system).

That would still allow the vast majority of KDE apps to move to a new 
build system, without using autotools.

What's the problem with having that choice?

And please remember this...

On Saturday 12 Feb 2005 15:26, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> That does _not_ mean, that applications with more complex
> dependencies and requirements can easily switch away.

Regards
Martin
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic