[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: scons
From: Martin Ellis <m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk>
Date: 2005-02-13 17:38:40
Message-ID: 200502131738.40440.m.a.ellis () ncl ! ac ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 13 Feb 2005 16:23, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> No, please don't. Current autohell+scons ? This would mean yet
> another tool ! This would make the build system just even harder to
> understand I'm afraid.
My suggestion did not require that _everyone_ continue to use
autotools, merely that they were still available for apps that still
need them (or that had not yet migrated to a new build system).
That would still allow the vast majority of KDE apps to move to a new
build system, without using autotools.
What's the problem with having that choice?
And please remember this...
On Saturday 12 Feb 2005 15:26, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> That does _not_ mean, that applications with more complex
> dependencies and requirements can easily switch away.
Regards
Martin
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic