On Friday 29 October 2004 08:10, Luke Sandell wrote:
> Conserving memory is a good idea, but it leads to one problem.  If one
> window crashes, they all crash, because there is only one process.
"We're not designing software to crash"
>
> Wouldn't it be a better idea to have multiple processes but the majority of
> code in a shared library?  That way you are conserving memory,  but if one
> crashes the rest are unaffected.
No, you are conserving code, not memory. Still a lot of memory is used by
calling the same application twice, that can be shared.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch
Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Py'guapy 평화
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<