--===============1552848510== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1293387.hre0yq7S0E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1293387.hre0yq7S0E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:34 am, Brendan wrote: > > I wish people would find something different to complain about with > > Gentoo, it's not like you can't *use* your system while it's compiling. > > You can't regulate what people complain about. Give them an alternative. I never said I could regulate what people complained about. An alternative= =20 for those who like complaining would be the increasing price of peanut=20 butter. :P > > People have no problems with Folding@Home or Seti@Home, but turn on a > > background compile and OH MY GOD HORROR. > > Yes, horror when you have no updated software for 3 days. Most people want > everything now. Not saying that it is right or not, but you said you wish= ed > they would find something else to complain about. Well in my experience new packages hit Portage soon after an upstream relea= se. =20 Even when Gentoo is slacking in that department, people with experience on= =20 Gentoo know that it is typically as simple as copying the ebuild file and=20 bumping the version number. Although it may take a bit of time to compile,= =20 Gentoo users typically can get a head start on the process, so that evens=20 things out a little. But please, please, please don't exaggerate. I once tried to use Gentoo on= a=20 laptop with 64 MB of RAM and a AMD K6-2 with hardly any cache (although it= =20 was 550 MHz IIRC). Anyways, I didn't try compiling KDE, but compiling and= =20 installing XFree86 "only" took about 8-10 hours on that. Although hardly a= =20 speed record, it's not "3 days". Besides, Gentoo provides binary packages for the larger items (although tho= se=20 aren't updated nearly as often as the source releases in Portage), so it's= =20 not like you're completely screwed. But hey, if you're using a low-spec=20 system, then I'll be the first to implore you to *use something else*. I'm= =20 not quite sure what (although I suppose Ark Linux or Yoper springs to mind)= ,=20 but my point isn't that Gentoo is great for everyone (it's not), my point i= s=20 that compiling software shouldn't be a problem for most users. After all, it's not like there is a dearth of things to complain about=20 regarding Gentoo. There's all the zealots who act like Gentoo is the best= =20 thing since sliced bread (it's not), or the fact that upgrading GCC to the= =20 next major release is like playing russian roulette with your KDE=20 installation (you should see the bug reports for JuK, whose C++ dependencie= s=20 exacerbate the problem). Maybe it's just me, but I just can't understand the people who complain abo= ut=20 having to compile software. If you managed to survive through yesterday=20 without foo-x.y+1, I think you'd be able to manage another hour (or even, G= od=20 forbid, a day). It's not like you're using Windows 98 where you simply can= 't=20 do anything else, unless you're trying to play UT2004 or something you shou= ld=20 be able to use your computer just fine, even while it is compiling somethin= g. If you really must have the latest and greatest *NOW*, then you'll usually = end=20 up compiling from source anyways, which is *exactly* what you'd be doing=20 under Gentoo. Regards, - Michael Pyne --nextPart1293387.hre0yq7S0E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBfyomqjQYp5Omm0oRAq1OAJ0Z1wYg+dwygOhk5ngSrAsG1cErXwCfWXRX 6fXmJ/Ot+tuF0RbpN/gbz9A= =DJ1i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1293387.hre0yq7S0E-- --===============1552848510== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << --===============1552848510==--