From kde-devel Wed Oct 13 23:25:38 2004 From: Michael Pyne Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:25:38 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Execution replay for Qt/KDE applications Message-Id: <200410131925.46196.pynm0001 () unf ! edu> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=109770998002516 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1919713890==" --===============1919713890== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3561917.WzY1j7Z330"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart3561917.WzY1j7Z330 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 13 October 2004 07:26 pm, Frans Englich wrote: > Perhaps the same could be done with Qt/KDE apps; With Qt's introspection > random QWidgets are selected, and they are then fed with random signals... Well the tool in the article you referenced sent random, but valid, input t= o=20 the program. Although I agree that it would be nice for a program to not=20 crash under an assault of random Qt signals, I think that would rather=20 unrealistic. Some signals might not be emitted from user input at all (for= =20 example, a signal emitted only on startup), so I don't think it's fair to=20 subject a program to that. ;-) A program that would duplicate that tool for Qt would be a very nice testin= g=20 tool however. Regards, - Michael Pyne --nextPart3561917.WzY1j7Z330 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBbbl6qjQYp5Omm0oRAsy9AKDNc+voz53yKZJKsXBQXziKQfYwwACgwAeq L3gT2SZBNWRmyZByt+xA1r8= =plDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3561917.WzY1j7Z330-- --===============1919713890== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << --===============1919713890==--