On Monday 15 September 2003 15:51, Andy Fawcett wrote:
> On Monday 15 September 2003 22:42, George Staikos wrote:
> > On Monday 15 September 2003 15:28, Harri Porten wrote:
> > > On 11 Sep 2003, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> > > > are there reasons NOT to move it?
> > >
> > > FWIW, have to agree with the others saying that a) kdebase is
> > > bloated enough already (should be stripped) and b) a dial-up
> > > connection is not common enough.
> > >
> > > Now that I finally have an Internet connection again I might spend
> > > some time on making kppp a bit more "generic" :)
> >
> >   Could this involve a DSL dialup manager by any chance? :-)
>
> Dialup? DSL? What a strange concept...
>
> Yeah, I know... I'm just lucky to not have to dialup on my DSL :)

  The DSL providers around here provide a utility that works just like a PPP 
dialup connection manager.  I think Linux really needs one of these as it 
makes DSL setup far more accessible for the average user.  Setting up PPPOE 
is not that easy.  Even though many distros do the "setup", it's much nicer 
to provide something similar to what the DSL provider ships their Windows 
clients.

-- 
George Staikos
KDE Developer				http://www.kde.org/
Staikos Computing Services Inc.		http://www.staikos.net/

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<