[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: [patch] request for review - apidox for kdelibs/kdeui (long)
From:       Brad Hards <bhards () bigpond ! net ! au>
Date:       2003-09-09 10:20:44
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:00 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > In that case, wouldn't it make more sense not to define KDE_NO_COMPAT
> > when building the documentation:
>
> [patch]
>
> This would make all the deprecated API calls invisible to doxygen and you
> have no way to document it.
OK, then I'm confused again. If we #define KDE_NO_COMPAT, we remove reference 
to all the deprecated calls (since they are all wrapped in #ifndef), which is 
not what we want.

Can you explain this to me again?

Brad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Xal8W6pHgIdAuOMRAgZKAKC8MMAEwnqagICHt9vaMRnVwrdO0QCgud+k
FFMISNLznzgrdj8++lpPfuc=
=RuI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]