You sold me, KDE 3 it will be. Thanks, that's the answer I was looking for.

Roberto Mason
Sir Wilfrid Laurier School Board
IT Department (Pedagogical systems)
235, montée Lesage
Rosemère, QC
J7A 4Y9

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron J. Seigo [mailto:service@urbanlizard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:08 PM
To: kde-devel@kde.org
Subject: Re: Should I install KDE 2.2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 13 August 2003 08:04, Mason, Roberto wrote:
> I was thinking of starting with 2.2 because I must admit that I'm not that
> strong with c++, I've coded in C before, that's going back quite a few
> years, and I want to get back into C/C++. I have a few books around that
> would help. To simplify matters for me, I was thinking, since there is
> written documentation on 2.2, it would ease the learning curve for me. Once
> I'd be comfortable with 2.2, jumping to 3.1 would much easier.

there really weren't that many fundamental API changes from 2.2. to 3.1. some
header files changed, but nothing too egregious... just make sure you are use
kapplication.h instead of kapp.h and that sort of thing... but the basic
concepts (KConfig, XMLUI, KAboutData, KApplication, KMainWindow, etc) all
remained. some KDE2 applications required nothing more than a recompile for
KDE3. there is lots of KDE3 code to look at for examples, and there is up-to-
date API documentation at developer.kde.org.

also, if you have a full-time connection to the 'net, you can jump on IRC
(freenode.net) and join one of the KDE devel channels (e.g. #kde-devel) where
quite a few people hang out discussion KDE3 development issues...

HTH

- --
Aaron J. Seigo, Geeko
Urbanlizard.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/OmJ01rcusafx20MRAp6aAJ4vAEYQK+kQaxqgm9SIYfeDvnpF2gCggDgy
ZRHUQ7fe9bb+KWQK6Nso7C0=
=A9tC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<