On Wednesday 13 August 2003 09:08, David Findlay wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 04:58 pm, Michael Pyne proclaimed:
> > I'm not a KDE developer (yet, heheheh :) ), but I very highly doubt it.
> > First of all, unless I'm mistaken, there is already something similar to
> > GConf2, which is the KConfig module.  It doesn't support tree-based
> > structures, but that is rather easy to emulate anyways, either by switching
> > groups or using different value strings (e.g. Colors-bgColor,
> > Colors-fgColor, etc.).
> 
> The problem though at the moment is it's still all stored in a whole bunch of
> textfiles in the $HOME/.kde directory. A registry style system would be heaps
> faster, and more robust. Maybe gconf2 isn't the solution, but something
> similiar would be. Thanks,

If it's faster you should first proove I guess - taking that the data is stored
out of process I wouldn't even name it more robust.

Greetings, Stephan
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<