'Shouldn't this patch go into the clear() function instead?'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List: kde-devel
Subject: Shouldn't this patch go into the clear() function instead?
From: Larsson Roger <roger.larsson () optronic ! se>
Date: 2003-04-24 10:07:15
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

I read the kde-cvs digest...

http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdemultimedia/juk/searchwidget.cpp.
diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&f=h

i.e. clearing an already empty (anything) should
not emit a signal.

/RogerL
###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Shouldn't this patch go into the clear() function instead?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><FONT SIZE=2>I read the kde-cvs digest...</FONT>
</P>

<P><FONT SIZE=2><A HREF="http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdemultimedia/juk/searchwidget.cpp.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&f=h" \
TARGET="_blank">http://webcvs.kde.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/kdemultimedia/juk/searchwidget.cpp.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&f=h</A></FONT>
 </P>

i.e. clearing an already empty (anything) should
 not emit a signal.

<P><FONT SIZE=2>/RogerL</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>###########################################<BR>
<BR>
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.<BR>
For more information, connect to <A HREF="http://www.F-Secure.com/" \
TARGET="_blank">http://www.F-Secure.com/</A></FONT> </P>

</BODY>
</HTML>

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 