>
>
>Adding another tab page would be counter-intuitive.
>
yes.

> I've been mulling this 
>over and the best way I could think of so far is to add a ACL button to the 
>perms page and then have a seperate dialog that is sorta like the NT/2k/XP 
>permissions dialog. This button would be completely hidden in the case where 
>the FS on the system didn't support ACLs. Thus elimnating clutter and keeping 
>the UI still usable.
>
I suggest reengineering the permissions tab to be titled "security" and 
work like the security tab in windows 2000.  IF there is support for 
ACLs, more than one user/group can be added to the list, if there isn't, 
only one user can be added.  That way the listbox should say (with 
little icon heads and group icons):
-------------------------
Owner: Manuel Amador (amadorm)
(Take ownership) <- button

Permissions:
G  webmasters:  read only (primary group)
U  Juan Perez (jperez): read/write
   World: none

Permissions for items created in this folder:
G webmasters: read/write (primary group)
U  Juan perez (jperez): read only
-----------------------------


 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<