[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Why was this feature removed?
From: Nicolas Goutte <nicog () snafu ! de>
Date: 2002-11-29 14:59:49
[Download RAW message or body]
On Friday 29 November 2002 12:57, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 November 2002 02:04, James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> >>Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> >>>The font substitution mechanism is quite powerful and would even work
> >>>with UTF-8 encoded pages, a case where your proposal would not work.
> >>
> >>Sure it would. Mozilla lists, along with the languages, "Unicode".
> >
> > How could it work if you cannot display a Japanese page with a Japanese
> > encoding.
> >
> > With a page served as UTF-(, you have again the same problem. What font
Sorry, it should read UTF-8
> > is best for Latin characters, which for Chinese, which for Cyrillic,
> > which for... If you can only choose a font, you have gained nothing. The
> > font substitution permits to choose alternate fonts where the first font
> > has lacks.
>
> I'm not sure that we are understanding each other.
>
> In Mozilla you can select a character encoding to *read* the page with
> -- and they are listed by the names of languages rather than the ISO-..
> numbers, which is a nice feature. But, also included in this list is
Konqueror (as browser) lists both: languages and encoding codes
> Unicode which I presume corresponds to UTF-8. So, you can select a
> language specific font, or you can select unicode. I don't know how
> Mozilla handles it internally, but it usually works.
I suppose that it does it the same was as Konqueror. As I am not sure how it
does it, I will not write it here.
Have a nice day/evening/night!
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic