[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: [Patch - untested] KControl screensaver dialog
From:       "yakanet.fr" <jerome () yakanet ! fr>
Date:       2002-07-03 9:48:02
[Download RAW message or body]

ATTENTION LES MAILS N'ARRIVENT PLUS A LA BONNE ADRESSE

----- Original Message -----
From: "Waldo Bastian" <bastian@kde.org>
To: <kde-devel@kde.org>
Cc: <kde-usability@kde.org>
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Patch - untested] KControl screensaver dialog


On Monday 01 July 2002 01:23 pm, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> this still doesn't cover the situation where (for whatever reason) there
> isn't a screensaver set up, and the user may actually mean it when they
> say, "i don't want a screen saver. ever."

With your patch they would still get one when they choose "lock". (The blank
one)

In the current state it is not possible to say "I want to have this fancy
screensaver but I only want to use it when I explictly lock my desk, I don't
want to have the screensaver kicking in automatically". I think that's a
needless restriction.

> perhaps kdesktop_lock should be enhanced to default to the blank screen
> saver if none is set and the user is attempting to lock their desktop,
> something like:

Yes, this makes sense, regardless of whether we change the screensaver
config
dialog or not.

Cheers,
Waldo
--
bastian@kde.org  |   SuSE Labs KDE Developer  |  bastian@suse.com


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
<<



 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]