[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Fundamental KDE Library Problem..
From:       "yakanet.fr" <jerome () yakanet ! fr>
Date:       2002-07-03 9:44:54
[Download RAW message or body]

ATTENTION LES MAILS N'ARRIVENT PLUS A LA BONNE ADRESSE

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Tedder" <matthew@tedder.com>
To: <kde-devel@kde.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:25 AM
Subject: Re: Fundamental KDE Library Problem..


> On Wednesday 03 July 2002 04:15 am, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 July 2002 05:37, Matthew Tedder wrote:
> >
> > [lots of lines with lots of good comments]
> >
> > > If the mission of KDE is to create a full desktop environment for UNIX
> > > and Linux, then it needs to consider those business process issues as
> > > bugs just as relevant as any technical ones--because for business and
the
> > > widespread adoption of KDE, they are bigger bugs.
> >
> > Hi Matthew,
> >
> > when reading your good (and long) statements here I start being green
with
> > envy thinking about how much time you have left to write these mails...
>
> I am wasting me time when I should be coding..  It's 2:11 am and I have
work
> that needs to be ready by 9:00am...  I'm just burned out from coding and
> email refreshes me a little..  These are important topics..
>
> >
> > Therefor please allow me to repeat my question:
> >
> >    Are you willing to develop/maintain the compatibility libraries
> >    that you proposed in another mail?
>
> Accept that special compatibility libraries are not necessary when you can
> just retain old versions simultaneously with the newer ones for backward
> compatibility--that's good enough for binaries.  My brain was somewhere
else
> when I talked about compatibility libraries..
>
> Source-wise, perhaps I could write a little script that helps setup one's
> shell session so the examples in all those outdated tutorials and books
> actually work...  (which is almost all of them).  I will at least
experiment
> with this a little..
>
> >
> > If so I am sure people will immediately stop thinking that we are
wasting
> > our time whild discussing with a troll here but - in contrary - they
will
> > be extremely thankfull seeing you doing such a great job on *improving*
> > (not only critizising) KDE.
>
> Constructive criticism is a good thing, depending on what you do with it.
>
> >
> > Cheers and thanks in advance,
> >
> > Karl-Heinz
>
> --
> Anything that can be logically explained, can be programmed.
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
unsubscribe <<
>
>

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]