From kde-devel Wed Jun 26 12:48:08 2002 From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:48:08 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: RTL and KDE vs. QT X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=102509587501428 On Wednesday 26 June 2002 14:18, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Wednesday 26 June 2002 13:27, David Faure wrote: > > On Wednesday 26 June 2002 17:46, Arash Zeini wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > After testing different applications with Farsi, we have found that the > > > level of support for RTL and BiDi differs from appplication to > > > application. > > > > > > KEdit, KBabel and KMail have it implemented best. > > > > Did you try KWord? ;-) > > > > > It is almost not working in Kate. > > > Is there any specific guideline or recommendation on how to implement > > > and support BiDi and RTL in KDE applications? Is the problem solved in > > > Qt or KDE level? > > > > Mostly Qt. But KDE apps which implement their own text layout stuff need > > to reimplement/reuse Qt's mechanism. > > > > > Having a recommendation (a HOWTO?) on how to BiDi enable KDE (and Qt) > > > applications would help very much to unify the approach. > > > > For KWord I based everything on Qt's approach. > > I have testet various application in reverse-english. There is a few KDE > widgets that currently needs work. Especially the trees used in kcontrol, > kmail and konqueror, and the kmenu in kicker. The rest of the problems I > have encountered have been very easy to fix. > Sorry, I just checked. Kmenu does reverse now. Great work! >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<