[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Qt Xemacs ??
From:       Rodolfo Conde Martinez <rcm () gmx ! co ! uk>
Date:       2002-05-06 23:53:25
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 06 May 2002 03:47, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 03 May 2002 01:51, Rodolfo Conde Martinez wrote:
> > 	But as you said, XParts is still not fully operational and i would like
> > more a KPart xemacs that a xpart....
>
> Read a bit about XPart.
> And XPart components "looks" like a KParts component to the hosting
> application, that's the whole point of it - no change required in the
> application, if it already supports embedding KParts components.


	i see, thats ok but i think having a native qt xemacs would be the best, in 
that way xemacs can take full advantage of all the Qt stuff, antialising, Xft 
extensions, themes, etc. and i guess having a native Qt xemacs, from there it 
would be easy to do a Kpart for kde.....of course i didnt mean XParts was 
bad, i just would prefer a native xemacs Qt (i dont have TTF fonts inside 
xemacs, i had to install the xfstt server to have'em :(, but lately that 
doesnt work, so im stuck with ugly fonts.....) and im really dying to see 
xemacs inside KDevelop :):)....

	Cheers...


- -- 
rcm.
rcm@gmx.co.uk
GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt
ICQ 118193727
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE81xd2x2Sktruwba0RAuz0AKDO39hoHxnlME6F2zyXNEjxX/f9yACeK2Gq
mz4CnWEc9nRvZ0Ch8kqppBQ=
=DZbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]