From kde-devel Thu Apr 11 13:47:12 2002 From: "Mechant, R. \(Reinout\)" Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:47:12 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Konqueror speed question/proposal X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=101853293218400 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E15F.623F1A90" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E15F.623F1A90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all, first of all, I'm really happy with the speed of kde3! But ... (luckily there are still buts because otherwise development would stop!) Although the idea of using konqueror as filebrowser is a good idea, some changes might be needed! When I compare the time of startup between konqueror as a webbrowser and konqueror as a filebrowser (as in clicking on home on the desktop), the time consumption is the same. On my machine it is between 3 and 4 second. Now, however this is fast for konq as webbrowser, it is really slow for konq as filebrowser! Changing the preview options, by means of unselecting everything, doesn't change the speed. My question: What is the difference in the modules/libs to be loaded between konq as webbrowser and konq as filebrowser? My proposal: If there is a difference, isn't it possible to only load the modules for filebrowsing if konq is started as a filebrowser. In case somebody enters then a http url in the location box, then load the modules for webbrowsing. Ofcourse, is it possible? Kind regards, Reno ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E15F.623F1A90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Konqueror speed question/proposal

Hi all,

first of all, I'm really happy with the speed of = kde3!
But ... (luckily there are still buts because = otherwise development would stop!)

Although the idea of using konqueror as filebrowser = is a good idea, some changes might be needed!
When I compare the time of startup between konqueror = as a webbrowser and konqueror as a filebrowser (as in clicking on home = on the desktop), the time consumption is the same. On my machine it is = between 3 and 4 second.

Now, however this is fast for konq as webbrowser, it = is really slow for konq as filebrowser!
Changing the preview options, by means of = unselecting everything, doesn't change the speed.

My question: What is the difference in the = modules/libs to be loaded between konq as webbrowser and konq as = filebrowser?

My proposal: If there is a difference, isn't it = possible to only load the modules for filebrowsing if konq is started = as a filebrowser. In case somebody enters then a http url in the = location box, then load the modules for webbrowsing.

Ofcourse, is it possible?

Kind regards,


Reno

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E15F.623F1A90-- >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<