On Monday 21 January 2002 2:08 pm, dep wrote:
> so. yeah, i'm eager to get involved in such a project. i wonder what
> else besides kmail needs patching? and if development were to get
> actively underway, whether there's space on a cvs server anywhere for
> a 1.x branch (hell, for all i know it may *still* be on cvs).
>
> ideas? anybody? any enthusiasm for this? oh, and one more question --
> ideas as to what could be done for office apps? has anybody does a
> static compile of koffice to see whether and how well it works and
> how much juice it requires?

Attacking the issue from the opposite side, what would need to be done to 
KDE-3.x in order to cut down on its functionality and therefore requirements? 

If it were possible to remove (via e.g. conditional compilation in the 
libraries) virtually all the eye candy, all the over-configuration 
"features", and all the stuff which really isn't required to run a basic 
desktop, then at least people would have an up to date option for those low 
end boxes.

-- 
  2:13pm  up 40 days, 22:21,  2 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<