[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: patched kdelibs/kdeui/KRestrictedLine
From:       Sebastian Trueg <sebastian () trueg ! de>
Date:       2001-11-26 0:11:58
[Download RAW message or body]

Hmm, I just saw that Qt 3.0 has QRegExpValidator what makes my class rather 
useless... :-(


On Monday 26 November 2001 00:51, Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> Here it is!
> Since I don't know what kind of header I should add, I added none. Perhaps
> you could do it when adding it to the cvs. I tested and am using with my
> own application.
>
> Is that what you wanted?
>
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> On Sunday 25 November 2001 17:30, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:19:00PM +0100, Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > > > While we're at it :-) Maybe KRestrictedLine should be ported to
> > > > QValidator instead. Making KRSL a dummy class and providing a
> > > > QValidator implementation for the concept of allowing or disallowing
> > > > certain characters. Would be much more reusable IMHO.
> > >
> > > Well, I thought about that. Should I do it?
> >
> > That would be uebercool :-)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> > >> unsubscribe <<

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]