[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-debian
Subject:    Slashdot: UserLinux Will Support KDE
From:       Adam Treat <manyoso () yahoo ! com>
Date:       2004-02-01 16:45:45
Message-ID: 200402011145.45484.manyoso () yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/01/1551242&mode=nested&tid=121&tid=189

On Sunday 01 February 2004 11:31 am, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 01 February 2004 03:51, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> > FYI... (see also last paragraph).
> >
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:00:44 -0800
> > From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
> > To: discuss@lists.userlinux.com, jpierre@cantv.net
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI
>
> ...
>
> > I already have a customer asking for Perens LLC to provide
> > commercial support for KDE on the UserLinux platform. And we will
> > do so, even though KDE is not the chosen GUI of the UserLinux
> > project. This is an option for any UserLinux service provider.
> >
> >     Thanks
> >
> >     Bruce
>
> I just wanted to forward exactly the same message, but now I saw
> you have been faster.
>
> I don't know what to think of it. This is getting ... bizarre.
> Bruce says: "we don't support qt". Then he says "because it is not
> good for commercial developlment." Now he says "we will support kde
> because a commercial vendor asks for it." But he says "we don't
> support it in UL".
>
> I don't understand this. It doesn't make any sense to me. Can
> somebody please explain this ?
>
> Bye
> Alex
_______________________________________________
kde-debian mailing list
kde-debian@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-debian
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]