[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-debian
Subject:    Re: [Fwd: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI]
From:       Alexander Neundorf <neundorf () kde ! org>
Date:       2004-02-01 16:31:33
Message-ID: 200402011731.33027.neundorf () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 01 February 2004 03:51, Kurt Pfeifle wrote:
> FYI... (see also last paragraph).
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:00:44 -0800
> From: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
> To: discuss@lists.userlinux.com, jpierre@cantv.net
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] xlibs based UI

...

> I already have a customer asking for Perens LLC to provide commercial
> support for KDE on the UserLinux platform. And we will do so, even
> though KDE is not the chosen GUI of the UserLinux project. This is an
> option for any UserLinux service provider.
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Bruce

I just wanted to forward exactly the same message, but now I saw you have been 
faster.

I don't know what to think of it. This is getting ... bizarre.
Bruce says: "we don't support qt". Then he says "because it is not good for 
commercial developlment." Now he says "we will support kde because a 
commercial vendor asks for it." But he says "we don't support it in UL".

I don't understand this. It doesn't make any sense to me. Can somebody please 
explain this ?

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf@jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf@kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex@neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net

_______________________________________________
kde-debian mailing list
kde-debian@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-debian
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]