This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1066546460== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all,=20 I just saw some threads about kde on windows.=20 http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3D132786&threshold=3D1&mode=3Dnes= ted&commentsort=3D0&op=3DChange http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2004/12/how-to-kill-open-source-on-desktop.htm= l - A very long and nice thread about the pro's and con's. I personally = like the following statements:=20 an anonymous writer=20 ...=20 b) Trying to insist users only use KDE on Linux/FreeBSD is turning a = deaf ear to what users want, and we know how well that strategy has = worked for Microsoft so far. If people want KDE on Windows, but they = can't get KDE on Windows, they'll go back to using native Windows, and = KDE will either end up only being used by Linux users, or it will become = irrelevant.=20 ...=20 Andreas Traw=F6ger said...=20 .... And now please tell me how would your Open Source Migration Strategy = look like? A simple switch from IE to Firefox is complicated enough, because every = Ecommerce Site we use would have to be tested. Migrating to OpenOffice = would be another major undertaking. Replacing Lotus Notes with something = else isn't simple too. Testing all our old 16 Bit Win 3.11 Application = with Wine also need it's time. Everything of this could be done, no doubt about that. But do you really = think it's going to help OpenSource on the Desktop if you have to do = every of this steps at once instead of doing one step after the other? Rube said ...=20 Open Source on Windows is a necessary step in levelling the playing = field. Once people are used to seeing applications other than those from = Microsoft, they just may take a look at a Lindows computer and say, = "What? It runs Firefox? And OpenOffice? And Maya? And Doom 3? I'll take = it!"=20 =20 Otto d.O. said...=20 > And the key here is the resources that are expended by open > source projects in porting to and supporting windows. I beg to differ. I don't think Windows ports are made by Linux = developers who desert their favourite OS because they want to help MS. = They are made by developers who want to or have to work on Windows. For = that reason, I think that Windows ports add resources to those projects; = they don't take away resources from free operating systems. Happy reading=20 Ralf ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,
 
I just saw some threads about kde on = windows.=20
 
http://ask.slash= dot.org/comments.pl?sid=3D132786&threshold=3D1&mode=3Dnested&= commentsort=3D0&op=3DChange
 
 
http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2004/12/how-to-kill-open-source-on-= desktop.html - A very long and nice thread about the = pro's and con's.=20 I personally like the following statements:
 
an anonymous writer
...
b) Trying to=20 insist users only use KDE on Linux/FreeBSD is turning a deaf ear to what = users=20 want, and we know how well that strategy has worked for Microsoft so = far. If=20 people want KDE on Windows, but they can't get KDE on Windows, they'll = go back=20 to using native Windows, and KDE will either end up only being used by = Linux=20 users, or it will become irrelevant.
...
 
Andreas Traw=F6ger said...=20
....
 And now=20 please tell me how would your Open Source Migration Strategy look=20 like?
A simple switch=20 from IE to Firefox is complicated enough, because every Ecommerce Site = we use=20 would have to be tested. Migrating to OpenOffice would be another major=20 undertaking. Replacing Lotus Notes with something else isn't simple too. = Testing=20 all our old 16 Bit Win 3.11 Application with Wine also need it's=20 time.

Everything of this could be done, no doubt about that. But = do you=20 really think it's going to help OpenSource on the Desktop if you have to = do=20 every of this steps at once instead of doing one step after the=20 other?

 Rube=20 said
...
 Open Source on Windows is a necessary step in levelling = the playing=20 field. Once people are used to seeing applications other than those from = Microsoft, they just may take a look at a Lindows computer and say, = "What? It=20 runs Firefox? And OpenOffice? And Maya? And Doom 3? I'll take it!"=20
 
 
Otto d.O. = said... 
> And the key here is the resources = that are=20 expended by open
> source projects in porting to and supporting=20 windows.
I beg to differ. I don't think Windows ports are made by = Linux=20 developers who desert their favourite OS because they want to help MS. = They are=20 made by developers who want to or have to work on Windows. For that = reason, I=20 think that Windows ports add resources to those projects; they don't = take away=20 resources from
free operating systems.
 
Happy reading
Ralf
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0-- --===============1066546460== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ kde-cygwin mailing list kde-cygwin@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-cygwin --===============1066546460==--