This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1066546460== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all,=20 I just saw some threads about kde on windows.=20 http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3D132786&threshold=3D1&mode=3Dnes= ted&commentsort=3D0&op=3DChange http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2004/12/how-to-kill-open-source-on-desktop.htm= l - A very long and nice thread about the pro's and con's. I personally = like the following statements:=20 an anonymous writer=20 ...=20 b) Trying to insist users only use KDE on Linux/FreeBSD is turning a = deaf ear to what users want, and we know how well that strategy has = worked for Microsoft so far. If people want KDE on Windows, but they = can't get KDE on Windows, they'll go back to using native Windows, and = KDE will either end up only being used by Linux users, or it will become = irrelevant.=20 ...=20 Andreas Traw=F6ger said...=20 .... And now please tell me how would your Open Source Migration Strategy = look like? A simple switch from IE to Firefox is complicated enough, because every = Ecommerce Site we use would have to be tested. Migrating to OpenOffice = would be another major undertaking. Replacing Lotus Notes with something = else isn't simple too. Testing all our old 16 Bit Win 3.11 Application = with Wine also need it's time. Everything of this could be done, no doubt about that. But do you really = think it's going to help OpenSource on the Desktop if you have to do = every of this steps at once instead of doing one step after the other? Rube said ...=20 Open Source on Windows is a necessary step in levelling the playing = field. Once people are used to seeing applications other than those from = Microsoft, they just may take a look at a Lindows computer and say, = "What? It runs Firefox? And OpenOffice? And Maya? And Doom 3? I'll take = it!"=20 =20 Otto d.O. said...=20 > And the key here is the resources that are expended by open > source projects in porting to and supporting windows. I beg to differ. I don't think Windows ports are made by Linux = developers who desert their favourite OS because they want to help MS. = They are made by developers who want to or have to work on Windows. For = that reason, I think that Windows ports add resources to those projects; = they don't take away resources from free operating systems. Happy reading=20 Ralf ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C50015.04A088B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable