From kde-core-devel  Sat Sep 01 21:59:56 2001
From: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda () pacbell ! net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 21:59:56 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: C++ file extensions (was Re: qt-copy updated)
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=99938178409304

On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 10:07:42PM +0200, Martijn Klingens wrote:

> (I BTW agree with Malte and Michael that it might be a bit too much to turn 
> CVS upside down, I didn't realize the amount of changes involved... Maybe we 
> should leave it with the conclusion that .cpp is better, but .cc should not 
> be changed and only _new_ files should have .coo extensions - or even retain 
> the current status quo, though I still feel that standardization would be a 
> great thing to have)
> 
> Martijn, not even knowing what his own opinion is here...

Yes, CVS is ehm.. archaic for lots of things that should be simple.  One
method of dealing with this (see bochs) is to have the configure script
rename the files on Windows.  This might be satisfactory.

- alex