Am Freitag, 31. August 2001 11:44 schrieb Simon Hausmann:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 11:26:49PM +0200, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> > - .cpp seems to be a bit more portable to non-Unix platforms when it
> > comes to out-of-the-box support without tweaking settings
>
> LOL :) I doubt a file extension influences the portability at all ;-)
>
> > Argument against:
> >
> > - .cc looks (arguably) cooler.
>
> I prefer .cc as well ;-)
>
> > Still, I personally would like to have extensions in KDE to be the same
> > everywhere. And while we're on it: it would also be nice if the name of a
> > file resembles the class inside it (kapp.h, anyone?). These two issues
> > would make it easier to guess file names without doing a search first,
> > which can't be a bad thing for productivity.
>
> I don't think it's worth to start big renaming actions in the CVS to turn
> all .cc's into .cpp or something. But that's just me :)
Michael's argument about patches against the old file name fail etc. made me 
consider this too :)
Maybe it's really not worth it...

-- 
Malte Starostik
PGP: 1024D/D2F3C787 [C138 2121 FAF3 410A 1C2A  27CD 5431 7745 D2F3 C787]