On Wednesday 25 July 2001 20:07, David Faure wrote:
> > I fully agree here too, but one question about the syntax: is operator
> > overloading a better way here? Like
> >
> > - config->group("Some Group Name")->readEntry("Some Key");
> > + config[ "Some Group Name" ][ "Some Key" ];
> >
> > It seems to me that KDE dislikes this syntax, because it is hardly used,
> > but I wonder why.
>
> Because it would have to be (*config)["group"], and this looks really ugly.

Ok, you win ;-)

Martijn