On Friday 22 June 2001 07:33 am, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2001 17:08, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > >   What would be _very_ useful and we haven't been able to find is a
> > > > C++ dcop library. [...]
> > >
> > > Are you sure you mean DCOP here? ;)
> >
> > Well are there any C++ DCOP libraries/classes that do not use Qt? (or C
> > ones that do not use GTK for that matter)
> >
> > C++ != Qt
>
> You could port the DCOP library to STL string/char *,
> remove the DCOP/Qt bridge, and that's about it. In theory there's nothing
> that depends on Qt except the DCOP/Qt bridge and the Qt marshalling
> for parameters.
> Hmm, ok, it's about the same as rewriting the whole library ;)

Don't we have a very bare bones DCOP C library? In the form of 
kdelibs/dcop/dcopc.c? Might need some work to bring it up to production 
quality... (like porting it to C++ and Qt... oh wait.. ;-)

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
As a first step to embrace the GPL, 
Microsoft now too has added ideological statements to its EULA.