On Friday 22 June 2001 18:13, aleXXX wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2001 17:12, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 05:08:36PM +0200, Rob Kaper wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 05:01:52PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > > >   What would be _very_ useful and we haven't been able to find is a
> > > > > C++ dcop library. [...]
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure you mean DCOP here? ;)
> > >
> > > Well are there any C++ DCOP libraries/classes that do not use Qt? (or C
> > > ones that do not use GTK for that matter)
> > >
> > > C++ != Qt
> >
> > But what's the problem with using/depending on Qt?
> >
> > Bye,
> >  Simon
>
> It's a big lib, it is not installed everywhere (e.g. servers), let's say a
> Gnome app which would like to talk to dcop probably would prefer something
> else than linking to Qt.
> These are also the reasons why my lisa daemon doesn't link to Qt, it's
> inappropriate for some kind of apps.
>
> Bye
> Alex

would you link to it if there was a qt-nows version that just supported 
tools, event loops, network etc., but didn't include any graphics stuff like 
widgets, pixmaps, painters? It would be quite a small lib.

Matthias