On Friday 18 May 2001 14:44, Lubos Lunak wrote:

>  Hmm. Such a long patch for a one-line change. Is there any serious reason
> why you want to replace all the NULL's with 0's ? It's the same.

Not quite, according to Stroustrup use of NULL is discouraged, 0 is 
preferred. I think it's because NULL is typed while '0' is "more flexible" or 
something like that. I don't have my copy of TC++PL 3rd at hand.

-- 
Guillaume
http://www.telegraph-road.org