[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: What's the deal with kdedb?
From:       Henrik Johnson <hpj () globecom ! net>
Date:       2001-05-16 14:09:40
[Download RAW message or body]

I've checked the diff of this file and the changes were not BC in between 
different 2.2pre releases. It is still compatible with 2.1, sorry about that.

/Mauritz
GlobeCom AB

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 5/16/01, 2:24:33 PM, Henrik Johnson <hpj@globecom.net> wrote regarding 
Re: What's the deal with kdedb?:


> KDE 2.2 and KDE 2.1 is not binary compatible either. I've tried running
> Kaccel at least broke it about a week ago I think. I found this out but
> recompiling kdelibs and not kdebase after an update from CVS and it
> didn't work.

> /Henrik Johnson
> GlobeCom AB

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

> On 5/16/01, 2:47:39 PM, aleXXX <alexander.neundorf@rz.tu-ilmenau.de> wrote
> regarding Re: What's the deal with kdedb?:


> > On Wednesday 16 May 2001 13:45, Matthias Elter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Alessandro Praduroux wrote:
> > > > and wait for QT3/KDE3.
> > >
> > > Just for the record, the plan is to port KDE 2.x to Qt3. There wont be a
> > > KDE 3.0 for at least another year. Maintaining the 2.x platform is
> critical
> > > for KDE now. So we might have a stable KDE 2.X based on Qt3 in fall 2001.
> > >
> > > Matthias

> > Sure ?
> > This helps nothing. Since Qt 3 will be binary incompatible to Qt 2, all
> our
> > KDE libs will be binary incompatible.
> > Then there is no point in keeping it "KDE  2".

> > Bye
> > Alex

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]