[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: What's the deal with kdedb?
From:       Henrik Johnson <hpj () globecom ! net>
Date:       2001-05-16 12:24:33
[Download RAW message or body]

KDE 2.2 and KDE 2.1 is not binary compatible either. I've tried running 
Kaccel at least broke it about a week ago I think. I found this out but 
recompiling kdelibs and not kdebase after an update from CVS and it 
didn't work.

/Henrik Johnson
GlobeCom AB

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 5/16/01, 2:47:39 PM, aleXXX <alexander.neundorf@rz.tu-ilmenau.de> wrote 
regarding Re: What's the deal with kdedb?:


> On Wednesday 16 May 2001 13:45, Matthias Elter wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:16:27AM -0400, Alessandro Praduroux wrote:
> > > and wait for QT3/KDE3.
> >
> > Just for the record, the plan is to port KDE 2.x to Qt3. There wont be a
> > KDE 3.0 for at least another year. Maintaining the 2.x platform is 
critical
> > for KDE now. So we might have a stable KDE 2.X based on Qt3 in fall 2001.
> >
> > Matthias

> Sure ?
> This helps nothing. Since Qt 3 will be binary incompatible to Qt 2, all 
our
> KDE libs will be binary incompatible.
> Then there is no point in keeping it "KDE  2".

> Bye
> Alex

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]